Documentation

Chat vs. Traditional Compatibility

Article

Chat vs. Traditional Compatibility

Every MX8 survey instrument renders in both the chat and traditional styles, and the style is set once per survey in the Theme tab. This reference summarizes how each instrument behaves in each mode and which style we recommend when you have a choice.

For background on the two styles and when to choose between them, see Traditional or Chat based survey experience?.

How to read this table
  • Chat and Traditional columns describe how the instrument is laid out in each style.
  • Recommended flags the style we generally prefer for that instrument. "Either" means both styles work well.
  • Grid-style instruments render row-by-row in chat. They are fully functional, but with many rows they can feel repetitive and add length to the survey — prefer the traditional style when grids dominate the questionnaire.
Compatibility Matrix
InstrumentChat behaviorTraditional behaviorRecommended
SelectSingle-question conversational prompt with tap-to-select optionsStandard radio list or button groupEither
Multi-selectOne prompt with tap-to-toggle optionsCheckbox listEither
RatingSingle rating prompt (slider, button, or star)Inline rating controlEither
Net Promoter Score0–10 scale as a single promptStandard 0–10 scale rowEither
NumberInline numeric input in the chat threadNumeric field on the pageEither
TextMessage-style open-end inputText area on the pageEither
RankingDrag-and-drop or tap-to-rank with anchor labelsGrid or stacked ranking, optimized for larger viewportsEither — chat for short lists, traditional for long ones
This or ThatEach pair shown as its own row with two side-by-side optionsAll pairs displayed simultaneously in a gridChat for engagement; Traditional when there are many pairs
This or That RatingEach comparison shown one at a timeMultiple comparisons laid out togetherChat
MaxDiffTwo passes per set (one per label, e.g. "Least" then "Most")Each set shown once with both labels side by sideTraditional — especially with many sets; chat works but doubles the prompts
Grid RatingEach row presented individually with its rating controlFull grid: rows as items, columns as ratingsTraditional
Grid SelectEach row shown as a vertical blockTabular grid with rows and columns visible at onceTraditional
Multi-select GridOne row at a time, with checkboxes or buttons per rowGrid with rows and columns visible simultaneouslyTraditional
Numeric GridEach row shown with numeric inputs for its columnsFull grid with scrollable columns and autosumsTraditional
Text HighlighterPassage rendered in the chat bubble; respondent drags to highlightPassage rendered on the page; respondent drags to highlightEither
ConsentConsent message delivered conversationally with accept controlConsent screen with accept controlEither
Kid PickerGuided multi-step prompts (count → ages → genders → availability)Sequential screens and compact multi-field formsChat — the guided flow maps naturally to the conversational style
Get All ChildrenThree-step flow: count → ages → gendersSequential screens with optional summary listChat
LocationInline location promptStandard location promptEither
Secure Video PlayerVideo fills most of the screen; dial, if used, appears beneath or besideVideo plays centered or fullscreen; dial appears on the right or bottomEither — both support DRM playback and dial testing
Show MessageMessage shown as a chat bubbleMessage shown on a pageEither
Show ImageImage shown in the chat threadImage shown on the pageEither
Show Embedded ContentEmbedded content rendered inlineEmbedded content rendered on the pageEither
Practical guidance
  • If your questionnaire is dominated by grids or a large MaxDiff, choose the traditional style. The grid instruments were designed to be seen as a whole, and running them row-by-row in chat adds length without adding insight.
  • If your questionnaire is mostly single-answer, rating, and open-end questions, choose the chat style. You will typically see faster completion, higher completion rates on mobile, and lower rates of poor-quality responses — see the head-to-head numbers.
  • If your questionnaire is mixed, pick the style that fits the majority of the critical questions. Because the style is set per survey, it is often worth splitting long studies with very different sections into separate surveys linked by a pass-through.